ISSN 2582-5445 (online)

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 78    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

THE PRIME ESSENTIALITIES OF PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNANCE ON THE GLOBE

    1 Author(s):  DR. HARI PRASAD MISHRA

Vol -  6, Issue- 1 ,         Page(s) : 78 - 86  (2019 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSI

Abstract

The establishment of democracy in countries with no prior democratic experience, its re-establishment in countries that had experienced periods of authoritarian rule, and the expansion in the number of independent states following the demise of European and Soviet communism led to the adoption of democracy in most countries. As a result of these changes, attention has been focused on constitutional rules that guide competition for and the exercise of political authority under democracy. Democratic governments are those that permit the nation’s citizens to manage their government either directly or through elected representatives. This is opposed to authoritarian governments that limit or prohibit the direct participation of its citizens. One of the fundamental aspects of constitutional design is the choice between presidential government, parliamentary government and a hybrid system that combines some aspects of these two. A main difference between the presidential and the parliamentary systems of governance is as a result of how that states executive, legislative and judiciary organs are organized.

1. The "presidential" model implies that the Chief Executive is elected by all those members of the electoral body: Buonomo, Giampiero (2003). "Titolo V e "forme di governo": il caso Abruzzo (dopo la Calabria)". Diritto&Giustizia Edizione Online.  – via Questia (subscription required)
2.  George, Edwards; Warrenberg, Martin (2016). Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy, AP* Edition – 2016 Presidential Election, 17th Edition. Pearson Higher Education. p. 16. ISBN 9780134586571.
3. Riggs, Fred W. (1997). "Presidentialism versus Parliamentarism: Implications for Representativeness and Legitimacy". International Political Science Review. 18 (3): 258. doi:10.1177/019251297018003003. JSTOR 1601343
4. Conceptual homogenization of a heterogeneous field: Presidentialism in comparative perspective". Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance: 72–152. 1994.
5.  Nelson, Dana D. (2008). Bad for Democracy: How the Presidency Undermines the Power of the People. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. p. 248. ISBN 978-0-8166-5677-6.
6.  Sirota, David (August 22, 2008). "Why cult of presidency is bad for democracy". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-09-20.
7. Sundquist, James (1992). Constitutional Reform and Effective Government. Brookings Institution Press. p. 11.
8. Wilson, Congressional Government (1885), pp. 186–187.
9. Balfour. "Introduction". The English Constitution.
10.  The Cabinet". The English Constitution.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details